Centre for Discrete Mathematics and its Applications
University of Warwick
4pm Tuesday 23rd of September, 2008
Room 4.31/4.33, Informatics Forum
We initiate the study of the trade off between the length of a probabilistically checkable proof of proximity (PCPP) and the maximal soundness that can be guaranteed by a 3-query verifier with oracle access to the proof. Our main observation is that a verifier limited to querying a short proof cannot obtain the same soundness as that obtained by a verifier querying a long proof. Moreover, we quantify the soundness deficiency as a function of the proof-length and show that any verifier obtaining ``best possible'' soundness must query an exponentially long proof.
In terms of techniques, we focus on the special class of inspective verifiers that read at most 2 proof-bits per invocation. For such verifiers we prove exponential length-soundness trade offs that are later on used to imply our main results for the case of general (i.e., not necessarily inspective) verifiers. To prove the exponential trade off for inspective verifiers we show a connection between PCPP proof length and property-testing query complexity, that may be of independent interest. The connection is that any linear property that can be verified with proofs of length m by linear inspective verifiers must be testable with query complexity logarithmic in m.